I’m wondering why so many people are embracing “science” to answer the origin of mankind.
As of right now, the best theories basically explain un-observable macro evolution (change from one species to another) by extending the timelines for “when this happened” to millions of years or who knows how long - but long enough that there’s absolutely no proof of it happening.
The other argument science gives for the origin of life is that “the earth was vastly different millions of years ago” with constant chemical reactions that took non living compounds and transformed them into the building blocks of life. Of course this plus the extremely elongated timeframe flies in the face of science because the entire theory is not provable even a bit nor is it observable.
The other interesting thing here is how science downplays people of faith as “stupid” or choosing God as a cop out for not knowing enough about “science”.
Seems much harder to believe in evolutionary theory….
As of right now, the best theories basically explain un-observable macro evolution (change from one species to another) by extending the timelines for “when this happened” to millions of years or who knows how long - but long enough that there’s absolutely no proof of it happening.
The other argument science gives for the origin of life is that “the earth was vastly different millions of years ago” with constant chemical reactions that took non living compounds and transformed them into the building blocks of life. Of course this plus the extremely elongated timeframe flies in the face of science because the entire theory is not provable even a bit nor is it observable.
The other interesting thing here is how science downplays people of faith as “stupid” or choosing God as a cop out for not knowing enough about “science”.
Seems much harder to believe in evolutionary theory….
No comments yet.