Social Media

Evolution has been taught as nearly fact in American schools and universities for decades now, but there is no scientific proof for macro evolution (evolution between species types) nor is there a shred of evidence that life can come from non life. Even if amino acids have been found to come from non living matter, these are nowhere near the classification for life which is almost infinitely more complex.

What is even more interesting is that if life were to form from non live billions of years ago, then why does recorded human history only go back a few thousand years? Apparently the science can find things from billions of years ago by inference but it seems societal history cuts off within about 10,000 years back?

I’m wondering why so many people are embracing “science” to answer the origin of mankind.
As of right now, the best theories basically explain un-observable macro evolution (change from one species to another) by extending the timelines for “when this happened” to millions of years or who knows how long - but long enough that there’s absolutely no proof of it happening.

The other argument science gives for the origin of life is that “the earth was vastly different millions of years ago” with constant chemical reactions that took non living compounds and transformed them into the building blocks of life. Of course this plus the extremely elongated timeframe flies in the face of science because the entire theory is not provable even a bit nor is it observable.

The other interesting thing here is how science downplays people of faith as “stupid” or choosing God as a cop out for not knowing enough about “science”.

Seems much harder to believe in evolutionary theory….

What's up?